Skip to main content

Dilbert Creator Teaches Spot-On Lesson on Entrepreneurship without Mentioning the “E” Word

Dilbert Creator Teaches Spot-On Lesson on Entrepreneurship without Mentioning the “E” Word  

I have a PhD in entrepreneurship and I teach entrepreneurship at Oklahoma State University.
A couple days ago, I heard a podcast by Scott Adams, the creator of Dilbert. The podcast (which is also available on YouTube) included a 10-minute mini-lesson on how to increase your likelihood of benefitting from ‘luck’. Although Adams’ lesson never mentioned the words ‘entrepreneur’ or ‘entrepreneurship’, it represents one of the best succinct how-to lessons on the topic of entrepreneurship I’ve ever heard.
Here’s a quick summary of the lesson.
You can increase your ‘luck’ (which I translate to “increase your chances of becoming a successful entrepreneur”) by
  • Having a positive attitude, expecting luck to happen in your favor.
  • Going wherever the energy level is the highest (both in terms of geography and industry).
  • Networking – meeting as many people as you can and keeping in touch.
  • Continually developing and expanding your skill stack.
  • Learning from every failure.
  • Being willing to pursue a few ‘long shots’ along the way.
Below are some particularly insightful quotes from the podcast.

Positive Attitude

Dr. Richard Wiseman [found] that people who had a positive attitude and expected luck had a wider field of vision, … they simply noticed opportunities that other people didn’t notice.
So there is something about expecting luck to happen, that can tune your brain to notice things … that you weren’t noticing before.

Energy

go where the energy is
I found the highest energy industry that I could get into in the highest energy place ... and that worked out great.
Follow the energy. … You might have to move. … If you’re somewhere where nothing’s happening, getting lucky … is very unlikely.
you want to go where there’s just more stuff happening so that there’s more chance for things to collide.

Networking

You want to network. … If you are rigorous about meeting people and keeping in touch, then the opportunity for luck to find you happens again.

Skill Stack

Skill stacking, which I talk about all the time, if you … keep layering [skills] on top of each other, the things that you could potentially do, just becomes geometrically larger.

Failure

if you’re trying to get … yourself in a position for luck to find you, … you need to keep trying stuff.
But try things that won’t kill you. … Because then even as you’re failing … it’s like three failures, four failures, five failures -- you get to five failures, and learn something from every one of those failures, the odds of the sixth one failing, start dropping dramatically.

Long Shots

Try some long shots. I always tried some things which could pay the rent. … But I always had some long shots brewing. And I still do that.
I like knowing that there’s something in my world that even though it’s a long shot, man, if this works, if this works, this would be amazing, to change the world.
Steve Trost is Associate Director of the Institute for the Study of Free Enterprise and can be contacted at trost@okstate.edu.  He has a bachelor’s degree in engineering from MIT, a master’s degree and PhD in engineering from Oklahoma State University and a PhD in entrepreneurship (also from OSU).

Follow Dr. Trost on twitter: @TrostParadox

Disclaimer: All comments, observations, and statements presented herein represent the opinions of the author and in no way reflect the views of Oklahoma State University or the Institute for the Study of Free Enterprise.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Risk-Management Approach to Defeating SARS-CoV2 and COVID-19

A Risk-Management Approach to Defeating SARS-CoV2 and COVID-19   In 1921, Professor Frank Knight (an economist at the University of Chicago) published his most famous work, Risk, Uncertainty and Profit , where he differentiated ‘risk’ (comprising the realm of future unknowns that depend “on the future being like the past”) from ‘true uncertainty’ (those situations where the future is not just unknown, but truly unknowable , because of an extreme lack of similarity with any relevant prior cases).  As such, he quipped that [true uncertainty occupies that space where] opinions (and not scientific knowledge) actually guide most of our conduct (p. 233).  Unfortunately, we are in the midst of a global pandemic that resides much closer to the realm of true uncertainty than risk, giving rise to myriads of ‘opinions’ but scant ‘scientific knowledge’ that is truly actionable.  Six weeks ago, the World Health Organization, the Centers for Disease Control, the U.S. Surgeon General, and oth

The Rationale for Stopping All Government-Mandated Social Distancing Immediately

Epidemiologists universally acknowledge that population immunity is the only way to defeat SARS-CoV2 (the virus that causes COVID-19); population immunity will develop once enough ‘healthy’ individuals have been exposed to and recover from the virus, or once a vaccine has been developed and widely administered . Whereas development of a safe and effective vaccine is at least several months away, and could take years , we need long periods of ‘incomplete’ or ‘partial’ social distancing (but with a tight focus on protecting the most vulnerable members of our society ). To put this all into perspective, in their recent SARS-CoV2 / COVID-19 prediction models, Harvard epidemiologists found that “ social distancing with 60% reduction in R0 … was so effective that virtually no population immunity was built ” (italics added, p. 5). In other words, strong social distancing measures (like those currently in place) are too effective -- no population immunity can be built while they are in e